<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Where&#8217;s my bailout?!</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.webdesigntaxi.com/blog/2009/03/wheres-my-bailout/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.webdesigntaxi.com/blog/2009/03/wheres-my-bailout/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 23:41:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.webdesigntaxi.com/blog/2009/03/wheres-my-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-1297</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:26:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdesigntaxi.com/blog/?p=297#comment-1297</guid>
		<description>Also, from what I understand, the bonuses were already there. The part which Senator Dodd and Tim Geithner were responsible for were placing the loophole in the legislation that allowed the bonuses to be paid out with the bailout money. But the contracts were already in place before that.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, from what I understand, the bonuses were already there. The part which Senator Dodd and Tim Geithner were responsible for were placing the loophole in the legislation that allowed the bonuses to be paid out with the bailout money. But the contracts were already in place before that.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: admin</title>
		<link>http://www.webdesigntaxi.com/blog/2009/03/wheres-my-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-1296</link>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:10:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdesigntaxi.com/blog/?p=297#comment-1296</guid>
		<description>Agreed. The taxing was a bad call and only done to make &quot;some&quot; people look good. It is basically the modern version of a witch hunt to do so because the call was made to please an angry crowd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed. The taxing was a bad call and only done to make &#8220;some&#8221; people look good. It is basically the modern version of a witch hunt to do so because the call was made to please an angry crowd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://www.webdesigntaxi.com/blog/2009/03/wheres-my-bailout/comment-page-1/#comment-1295</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.webdesigntaxi.com/blog/?p=297#comment-1295</guid>
		<description>AIG did not put these bonuses in the contracts, Senator Dodd and Tim Geithner are responsible. They were either originally in Sen. Dodd&#039;s bill or were slipped in at some point, but if the legislation wasn&#039;t being shoved through Congress someone might have had time to read it. Timothy Geithner has no excuse why this should have happened under his watch, our own government is responsible.
That being said, it&#039;s wrong to tax these people 90%. No matter how mad we are, we can&#039;t legislate out of emotion, and it&#039;s unconstitutional to pass a bill of attainder like this. Think about it: are you really comfortable having a House that was able to pass legislation taxing a group of people 90% so quickly? They did this within one day with ease; what&#039;s going to happen if they decide WE need to be taxed more?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>AIG did not put these bonuses in the contracts, Senator Dodd and Tim Geithner are responsible. They were either originally in Sen. Dodd&#8217;s bill or were slipped in at some point, but if the legislation wasn&#8217;t being shoved through Congress someone might have had time to read it. Timothy Geithner has no excuse why this should have happened under his watch, our own government is responsible.<br />
That being said, it&#8217;s wrong to tax these people 90%. No matter how mad we are, we can&#8217;t legislate out of emotion, and it&#8217;s unconstitutional to pass a bill of attainder like this. Think about it: are you really comfortable having a House that was able to pass legislation taxing a group of people 90% so quickly? They did this within one day with ease; what&#8217;s going to happen if they decide WE need to be taxed more?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

